Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 00:47
A rational person can easily refute a flat-earther argument that the surface of the Earth is not curved. For a flat-earther, however, his (or her) argument against a curved earth, is convincing.
Existence of evil => God doesn’t exist
They bring up the argument because they find it convincing.
What defines the k'vanna of the Book of בראשית?
For some atheists, however, the argument is convincing.
Question: Why do atheists always argue about the existence of suffering in the world as meaning God doesn't exist when it doesn't prove anything?
Similarly, a religious person can easily refute the argument
A Year Out From the World Cup, the USMNT Looks Unprepared to Defend Home Turf - The Ringer